Background:

Isolation precautions are used in hospitals to interrupt the chain of transmission of nosocomial pathogens. There are several reports that isolation negatively impacts the care given to patients. Isolation protocol compliance has been reported between 40-70% in several studies.

Methods:

We conducted an anonymized survey of healthcare providers assessing the knowledge, practice and perceived impact of isolation precautions. The survey was conducted in a hematopietic stem cell transplant unit and a medical unit in an academic medical center. Surveys were given to nursing staff and resident physicians working on those units. Results were analyzed using chi-square test.

Results:

A total of 106 responses were received, 60 from nursing staff and 46 from resident doctors. Self- reported compliance to hand hygiene practices was 59.9%, this was significantly higher on leaving as compared to entering patient rooms amongst nurses (72% vs 50%, p=0.015). Overall adherence to isolation precautions was 60.3%, surprisingly nursing staff in the transplant unit had a significantly lower rate as compared to nurses in the medicine unit (44% vs 83%, p=0.025). 70.7% of respondents felt that patients on isolation precautions have to wait longer for non-emergent care. Only 56.6% of respondents felt that patients were educated about the reasons for isolation precautions; this number was significantly lower in residents as compared to nurses (41.3% vs 68.3%, p=0.005). 77.3% felt that patients in isolation are less satisfied in the care they received. 86.9% of resident physicians felt that isolation precautions helped reduce the spread of infection vs 68.5% of nurses (p=0.025). 82% of respondents expressed overall satisfaction with infection control practices.

Conclusions:

In our survey, we observed a low compliance of hand hygiene and isolation practices. While respondents felt that isolation adversely impacted patient satisfaction and care, they also opined that these practices help reduce the spread of infection. Surveys can be an important tool to assess knowledge and impact of infection control practices; and can be used to direct quality improvement initiatives.

Disclosures

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution